Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs for 6.15, v2...
Kent Overstreet <[email protected]> Fri, 28 Mar 2025 11:48:10 -0400
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.tech-board-discuss,org.kernel.vger.linux-bcachefs,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ighuwxny4a3obxwbmfsblz4lzpc2qubqqu4nqf6yvqsttuqffc@hs2tbqrwjo4v> |
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 04:46:21PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 14:56 -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > The following changes since commit > > 1a2b74d0a2a46c219b25fdb0efcf9cd7f55cfe5e: > > > > bcachefs: fix build on 32 bit in get_random_u64_below() (2025-03-14 > > 19:45:54 -0400) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > git://evilpiepirate.org/bcachefs.git tags/bcachefs-2025-03-24 > > > > for you to fetch changes up to > > d8bdc8daac1d1b0a4efb1ecc69bef4eb4fc5e050: > > > > bcachefs: Kill unnecessary bch2_dev_usage_read() (2025-03-24 > > 09:50:37 -0400) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > bcachefs updates for 6.15 > > I note that the controversial block changes that got NAK'd but which > you tried to put into your first pull request are now removed from this > v2 pull request, thanks. > > I also thought it was time to state more formally what's been > circulating around a few maintainers as shared knowledge: any tree you > send a pull request for that includes changes outside of bcachefs won't > be accepted by Linus. We had a situation where the process clearly broke down in -block, and I opted to let Linus make the call (knowing he'd already been CC'd on the previous thread).