Re: [PATCH 19/21] gpio: swnode: replace gpiochip_find() with gpio_device_find_by_label()
Paul Cercueil <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:11:31 +0100
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.timestamp,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-gpio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-omap,org.kernel.vger.linux-tegra,org.kernel.vger.platform-driver-x86 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le mercredi 24 janvier 2024 =C3=A0 16:04 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 3:59=E2=80=AFPM Paul Cercueil <[email protected]= et> > wrote: > >=20 > > Hi Bartosz, > >=20 > > Le mardi 05 septembre 2023 =C3=A0 20:53 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski a > > =C3=A9crit : > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]> > > >=20 > > > We're porting all users of gpiochip_find() to using > > > gpio_device_find(). > > > Update the swnode GPIO code. > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > > > <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > =C2=A0drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c | 29 ++++++++++++----------------= - > > > =C2=A01 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > >=20 > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c > > > b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib- > > > swnode.c > > > index b5a6eaf3729b..56c8519be538 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c > > > @@ -31,31 +31,26 @@ static void swnode_format_propname(const char > > > *con_id, char *propname, > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0 strscpy(propname, "gpios", max_size); > > > =C2=A0} > > >=20 > > > -static int swnode_gpiochip_match_name(struct gpio_chip *chip, > > > void > > > *data) > > > +static struct gpio_device *swnode_get_gpio_device(struct > > > fwnode_handle *fwnode) > > > =C2=A0{ > > > -=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 return !strcmp(chip->label, data); > > > -} > > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 const struct software_node *gdev_node; > > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 struct gpio_device *gdev; > > >=20 > > > -static struct gpio_chip *swnode_get_chip(struct fwnode_handle > > > *fwnode) > > > -{ > > > -=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 const struct software_node *chip_node; > > > -=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 struct gpio_chip *chip; > > > - > > > -=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 chip_node =3D to_software_node(fwnode); > > > -=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 if (!chip_node || !chip_node->name) > > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 gdev_node =3D to_software_node(fwnode); > > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 if (!gdev_node || !gdev_node->name) > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0 return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > > >=20 > > > -=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 chip =3D gpiochip_find((void *)chip_node->n= ame, > > > swnode_gpiochip_match_name); > > > -=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 return chip ?: ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER); > > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 gdev =3D gpio_device_find_by_label((void *)= gdev_node->name); > > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 return gdev ?: ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER); > > > =C2=A0} > > >=20 > > > =C2=A0struct gpio_desc *swnode_find_gpio(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode= , > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 const char *con_id, unsign= ed int > > > idx, > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 unsigned long *flags) > > > =C2=A0{ > > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 struct gpio_device *gdev __free(gpio_device= _put) =3D NULL; > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 const struct software_node *swnode; > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 struct fwnode_reference_args args; > > > -=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 struct gpio_chip *chip; > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 struct gpio_desc *desc; > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 char propname[32]; /* 32 is max size o= f property name */ > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 int error; > > > @@ -77,12 +72,12 @@ struct gpio_desc *swnode_find_gpio(struct > > > fwnode_handle *fwnode, > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0 return ERR_PTR(error); > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 } > > >=20 > > > -=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 chip =3D swnode_get_chip(args.fwnode); > > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 gdev =3D swnode_get_gpio_device(args.fwnode= ); > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 fwnode_handle_put(args.fwnode); > > > -=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 if (IS_ERR(chip)) > > > -=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0 return ERR_CAST(chip); > > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 if (IS_ERR(gdev)) > > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0 return ERR_CAST(gdev); > >=20 > > I'm a bit late to the party, sorry. > >=20 > > I'm looking at how __free() should be used to use it in my own > > patchset, and I was wondering if this code actually works. > >=20 > > What happens if swnode_get_gpio_device() returns an error pointer? > > Won't that cause a call to gpio_device_put() with the invalid > > pointer? > >=20 > > Cheers, > > -Paul > >=20 >=20 > No. because the __free() callback is defined as: >=20 > DEFINE_FREE(gpio_device_put, struct gpio_device *, > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_T)) gpio_device_put(_T)) Ok. I missed this. I would argue that it's still not right though - it should probably use IS_ERR() instead. gpio_device_put() only happens to accept NULL pointers because the "dev" field is at the very beginning of the "gpio_device" struct. I'm not sure this works with e.g. CONFIG_RANDSTRUCT_FULL. > Bart Cheers, -Paul > > >=20 > > > -=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 desc =3D gpiochip_get_desc(chip, args.args[= 0]); > > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 desc =3D gpiochip_get_desc(gdev->chip, args= .args[0]); > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 *flags =3D args.args[1]; /* We expect = native GPIO flags */ > > >=20 > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 pr_debug("%s: parsed '%s' property of = node '%pfwP[%d]' - > > > status (%d)\n", > >=20