Re: [PATCH V3 2/6] dt-bindings: timestamp: Add Tegra234 support
Linus Walleij <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Mar 2023 09:35:53 +0100
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.timestamp,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-gpio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-tegra |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACRpkdYkYBimR_9-hDRk7Gsi+qq78_WYvD8PMAJwtE_n2zVs1w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:02 AM Dipen Patel <[email protected]> wrote: > However, as I understood, current point of contention/discussion is addition of the > nvidia,gpio-controller property. No I think you are talking past each other. Krzysztof talks about a "removed property": > Unfortunately, I don't understand this statement. The > nvidia,tegra194-gte-aon with removed property is in a released kernel > v6.2. What does it mean "technically"? It's a released kernel thus it is > a released ABI. The only property you remove is nvidia,slices, so deprecate it instead, problem solved. I don't think the added phandle is a problem, it can't cause backward compatibility issues since it is new. Yours, Linus Walleij