Re: [PATCH 00/26] netfs: Keep track of folios in a segmented bio_vec[] chain

Am 30.03.26 um 12:49 schrieb David Howells:
> Stefan Metzmacher <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Another possible way would be to skip this for now
>> cifs: Remove support for ITER_KVEC/BVEC/FOLIOQ from smb_extract_iter_to_rdma()
>> and I rebase my changes on top of Davids patches assuming they
>> will be stable commits (at least up to
>> cifs: Support ITER_BVECQ in smb_extract_iter_to_rdma())
> 
> I could certainly split my removal patch.  I want to remove FOLIOQ support,
> but I can leave KVEC and/or BVEC if they're still needed.

Yes, please keep them, I guess we can removed unused stuff at the end of the
merge window.

Any idea on how to resolve the actual conflict?

Thanks!
metze