Re: [PATCH v1] 9p: Fix mkdir to return NULL on success

   Thank you for the review. You're right about the unnecessary err variable
   and NULL check - v9fs_create() never returns NULL and p9_fid_put() 
handles
   both NULL and IS_ERR cases internally.

   I'll prepare a v2 patch with the simplified implementation as suggested.

   Regards,
   Hongling Zeng

在 2026年05月20日 01:35, David Laight 写道:
> On Mon, 11 May 2026 14:18:30 +0800
> Hongling Zeng <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> When mkdir succeeds, v9fs_vfs_mkdir_dotl() and v9fs_vfs_mkdir() return
>> ERR_PTR(0) which is incorrect. They should return NULL instead for
>> success and ERR_PTR() only with negative error codes for failure.
>>
>> Return NULL instead of passing to ERR_PTR while err is zero
>> Fixes smatch warnings:
>>    fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c:420 v9fs_vfs_mkdir_dotl() warn: passing zero to 'ERR_PTR'
>>    fs/9p/vfs_inode.c:695 v9fs_vfs_mkdir() warn: passing zero to 'ERR_PTR'
>>
>> This change does not alter the runtime behavior since ERR_PTR(0) and NULL
>> are equivalent. However, it improves code readability and silences static
>> analyzer warnings.
>>
>> Fixes: 88d5baf69082 ("Change inode_operations.mkdir to return struct dentry *")
>> Acked-by: Christian Schoenebeck <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng <[email protected]>
>>
>> ---
>> change inv1:
>> - Add clarification in commit message that this is not a functional
>>    change, as suggested by Christian Schoenebeck.
>> - Add acked-by.
>> ---
>> ---
>>   fs/9p/vfs_inode.c      | 5 ++---
>>   fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c | 4 ++--
>>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
>> index d1508b1fe109..d2d18c796b58 100644
>> --- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
>> @@ -672,13 +672,12 @@ v9fs_vfs_create(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir,
>>   static struct dentry *v9fs_vfs_mkdir(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir,
>>   				     struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode)
>>   {
>> -	int err;
>> +	int err = 0;
>>   	u32 perm;
>>   	struct p9_fid *fid;
>>   	struct v9fs_session_info *v9ses;
>>   
>>   	p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_VFS, "name %pd\n", dentry);
>> -	err = 0;
>>   	v9ses = v9fs_inode2v9ses(dir);
>>   	perm = unixmode2p9mode(v9ses, mode | S_IFDIR);
>>   	fid = v9fs_create(v9ses, dir, dentry, NULL, perm, P9_OREAD);
>> @@ -692,7 +691,7 @@ static struct dentry *v9fs_vfs_mkdir(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir,
>>   
>>   	if (fid)
>>   		p9_fid_put(fid);
>> -	return ERR_PTR(err);
>> +	return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : NULL;
>>   }
> That function is odd, it ends:
> 	fid = v9fs_create(v9ses, dir, dentry, NULL, perm, P9_OREAD);
> 	if (IS_ERR(fid)) {
> 		err = PTR_ERR(fid);
> 		fid = NULL;
>
> A 'return' here would solve the mess later on.
>
> 	} else {
> 		inc_nlink(dir);
> 		v9fs_invalidate_inode_attr(dir);
> 	}
>
> Can v9fs_create() even return NULL?
> In any case p9_fid_put() already contains an (inline) check for both
> NULL and IS_ERR() so the 'if (fid)' and 'fid == NULL' (above) are pointless.
>
> 	if (fid)
> 		p9_fid_put(fid);
> 	return ERR_PTR(err);
>
> -- David
>
>>   
>>   /**
>> diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c
>> index 71796a89bcf4..83a52a85ce08 100644
>> --- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c
>> +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c
>> @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static struct dentry *v9fs_vfs_mkdir_dotl(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
>>   					  struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>>   					  umode_t omode)
>>   {
>> -	int err;
>> +	int err = 0;
>>   	struct v9fs_session_info *v9ses;
>>   	struct p9_fid *fid = NULL, *dfid = NULL;
>>   	kgid_t gid;
>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static struct dentry *v9fs_vfs_mkdir_dotl(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
>>   	p9_fid_put(fid);
>>   	v9fs_put_acl(dacl, pacl);
>>   	p9_fid_put(dfid);
>> -	return ERR_PTR(err);
>> +	return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : NULL;
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int