Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] virtio-net: Fix ECN feature descritpion
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.virtio-comment |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:57:34PM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > From: Chia-Yu Chang <[email protected]> > > Clarify that the VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN gso_type flag does not mean that > TCP has IP-ECN set, instead it identifies TCP CWR flag is set and will be > cleared from the second segment. This is used to offload TCP CWR flag in a > way that is compatible with RFC3168 ECN but is problematic for non-RFC3168 > use of CWR flag. > > Signed-off-by: Chia-Yu Chang <[email protected]> > --- even the subject has a typo. > device-types/net/description.tex | 33 +++++++++++++++++--------------- > introduction.tex | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/device-types/net/description.tex b/device-types/net/description.tex > index 1b6b54d..a2c9de8 100644 > --- a/device-types/net/description.tex > +++ b/device-types/net/description.tex > @@ -54,7 +54,9 @@ \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Feature bits > > \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6 (8)] Driver can receive TSOv6. > > -\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN (9)] Driver can receive TSO with ECN. > +\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN (9)] Driver can receive TSO with TCP CWR flag set > + and follow the ACE bits handling approach mentioned in > + \hyperref[intro:rfc3168]{[RFC3168]}. > > \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO (10)] Driver can receive UFO. > > @@ -62,7 +64,9 @@ \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Feature bits > > \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO6 (12)] Device can receive TSOv6. > > -\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_ECN (13)] Device can receive TSO with ECN. > +\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_ECN (13)] Device can receive TSO with TCP CWR flag set > + and follow the ACE bits handling approach mentioend in > + \hyperref[intro:rfc3168]{[RFC3168]}. > > \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_UFO (14)] Device can receive UFO. > > @@ -695,8 +699,9 @@ \subsubsection{Packet Transmission}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / De > > \item If the driver negotiated the VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_ECN feature, > the VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN bit in \field{gso_type} > - indicates that the TCP packet has the ECN bit set\footnote{This case is not handled by some older hardware, so is called out > -specifically in the protocol.}. > + indicates that the TCP packet has TCP CWR flag set and the flag will be handled differently to all segements of > + an aggregated segment, as mentioned in \hyperref[intro:rfc3168]{[RFC3168]} > + \footnote{This case is not handled by some older hardware, so is called out specifically in the protocol.}. > \end{itemize} > > \item If the driver negotiated the VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_UDP_TUNNEL_GSO feature and the > @@ -788,10 +793,9 @@ \subsubsection{Packet Transmission}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / De > \field{gso_type} to VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_UDP_L4. > > The driver SHOULD NOT send to the device TCP packets requiring segmentation offload > -which have the Explicit Congestion Notification bit set, unless the > -VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_ECN feature is negotiated, in which case the > -driver MUST set the VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN bit in > -\field{gso_type}. > +which have the TCP CWR flag set and require the flag be handled as mentioned in what does require refer to? driver should not require? packets require? > +\hyperref[intro:rfc3168]{[RFC3168]}, unless the VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_ECN feature is > +negotiated, in which case the driver MUST set the VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN bit in \field{gso_type}. set for which packets? > > If VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_UDP_TUNNEL_GSO is negotiated, the driver MAY set > VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL_IPV4 bit or the VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL_IPV6 bit > @@ -1105,9 +1109,9 @@ \subsubsection{Processing of Incoming Packets}\label{sec:Device Types / Network > \end{enumerate} > > Additionally, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM, TSO4, TSO6, UDP, UDP_TUNNEL > -and ECN features enable receive checksum, large receive offload and ECN > -support which are the input equivalents of the transmit checksum, > -transmit segmentation offloading and ECN features, as described > +and ECN features enable receive checksum, large receive offload and RFC3168 > +ECN support which are the input equivalents of the transmit checksum, > +transmit segmentation offloading and RFC3168 ECN features, as described > in \ref{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Device Operation / > Packet Transmission}: > \begin{enumerate} > @@ -1210,10 +1214,9 @@ \subsubsection{Processing of Incoming Packets}\label{sec:Device Types / Network > the VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_UDP_TUNNEL_CSUM bit in \field{flags}. > > The device SHOULD NOT send to the driver TCP packets requiring segmentation offload > -which have the Explicit Congestion Notification bit set, unless the > -VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN feature is negotiated, in which case the > -device MUST set the VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN bit in > -\field{gso_type}. > +which have the TCP CWR flag set and require the flag be handled as mentioned in same question > +\hyperref[intro:rfc3168]{[RFC3168]}, unless the VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN feature is > +negotiated, in which case the device MUST set the VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN bit in \field{gso_type}. set for which packets? > > If the VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM feature has been negotiated, the > device MAY set the VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM bit in > diff --git a/introduction.tex b/introduction.tex > index e60298a..d52622e 100644 > --- a/introduction.tex > +++ b/introduction.tex > @@ -168,6 +168,9 @@ \section{Normative References}\label{sec:Normative References} > Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP > 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017 > \newline\url{http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc8174.txt}\\ > + \phantomsection\label{intro:rfc3168}\textbf{[RFC3168]} & > + S. Floyd., ``The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP'', September 2001. > + \newline\url{http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3168.txt}\\ > \end{longtable} > > \section{Non-Normative References} > -- > 2.34.1