Re: [PATCH v1] virtio-net: Fix to avoid using reserved feature bits

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.virtio-comment
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 10:39:59AM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 4/23/25 8:07 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 09:29:11AM -0700, Daniel Verkamp wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:46 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> I'm afraid we'll have to bite the bullet.
> >>
> >> One other issue with bits > 63 is that the vhost-user protocol
> >> VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES and VHOST_USER_SET_FEATURES messages use u64
> >> to represent the features, so vhost-user-net devices can't query or
> >> enable these features. vhost-user is outside the scope of the virtio
> >> spec, though, and I think it's reasonable to extend the protocol to
> >> enable high feature bits rather than avoiding them forever.
> > 
> > Yes you would use VHOST_USER_SET_PROTOCOL_FEATURES to make VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES
> > return two u64s, or even a new message returning an array.
> 
> I think that additionally the VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS_SET command
> will need some clarification, as in the current text looks a bit
> inconsistent:
> 
> """
> // in Offloads State Configuration / Setting Offloads State:
> 
> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UDP_TUNNEL_GSO  46
> 
> // ...
> 
> The class VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS has one command:
> VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS_SET applies the new offloads configuration.
> 
> le64 value passed as command data is a bitmask, bits set define
> offloads to be enabled, bits cleared - offloads to be disabled.
> 
> There is a corresponding device feature for each offload. Upon feature
> negotiation corresponding offload gets enabled to preserve backward
> compatibility
> """
> 
> The "corresponding device feature" has the same numerical value of the
> selected offloads, except for UDP tunnels related one (which are mapped
> to bits corresponding to reserved features).
> 
> It's unclear to me which should be the better way to address this
> inconsistency.
> 
> /P


Parav, what's your take here? Given your change broke
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS_SET, do you want to revert it?

-- 
MST
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.