Re: [PATCH] introduction: Clarify RFC 2119 key words usage

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.virtio-comment
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 07:19:54AM +0300, Parav Pandit wrote:
> RFC 2119 key words should be used in Requirements and Conformance
> sections; these key words to be avoided in rest of the sections.
> 
> The motivations for such clarity are:
> 
> 1. To clarify the intent:
> These key words carry precise semantic weight. When a spec says MUST,
> it means compliance is not optional. Using such terms in general or
> explanatory text risks misinterpreting guidance as a requirement.
> 
> 2. Avoiding Ambiguity:
> If normative language is used in non-normative (informative) sections,
> it becomes unclear whether the reader is required to follow it or
> if it's just background or suggestion.
> 
> 3. Informative sections explain context, rationale, or examples.
> Normative sections define rules. Mixing the two muddies the structure
> and weakens the authority of the normative part.
> 
> Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/230
> Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <[email protected]>
> ---
>  introduction.tex | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/introduction.tex b/introduction.tex
> index 80aa67a..4e7ab59 100644
> --- a/introduction.tex
> +++ b/introduction.tex
> @@ -196,7 +196,10 @@ \section{Terminology}\label{Terminology}
>  ``SHOULD'', ``SHOULD NOT'', ``RECOMMENDED'', ``NOT RECOMMENDED'', ``MAY'', and
>  ``OPTIONAL'' in this document are to be interpreted as described in
>  \hyperref[intro:rfc2119]{[RFC2119]} and \hyperref[intro:rfc8174]{[RFC8174]} when,
> -and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
> +and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. The use of these
> +key words is recommended in the Requirements and Conformance sections and should
> +be avoided in other sections.
> +
>  \subsection{Legacy Interface: Terminology}\label{intro:Legacy
>  Interface: Terminology}


The spec is for the reader, who has nothing to gain from this and will
just be confused. If you want to start a document with suggestions for
contributors, that might be a great idea, and this might belong there.

> -- 
> 2.34.1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.