Re: [PATCH] virtio-gpu: Fix missing driver conformance file

On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 08:11:43AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> 
> 
> > From: Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen <[email protected]>
> > Sent: 08 July 2025 01:36 PM
> > 
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 06:56:26AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > Hi ,
> > >
> > > > From: Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen <[email protected]>
> > > > Sent: 16 June 2025 04:00 PM
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 09:13:02PM +0300, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > > > Cited patch in the fixes tag missed to include the
> > > > > driver-conformance file. Add it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: f52fb20cbe38 ("virtio-gpu: support blob alignment
> > > > > information")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <[email protected]>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  device-types/gpu/driver-conformance.tex | 8 ++++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > > > >  create mode 100644 device-types/gpu/driver-conformance.tex
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Can you please raise the voting ballot for this patch which fixes
> > https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/223?
> > > I didn't create a new github issue as 223 is open and its half written patches
> > are not merged.
> > > It is fixed with this patch.
> > >
> > 
> > Why is it still open if the ballot has been voted?
> > 
> > Thanks, Matias
> 
> I dint merge because basic makepdf etc scripts fail without this proposed fix.
> And this proposed fix is non editorial in my view.
> So this proposed patch needs vote. Once voting passes, I will merge the original patch + this fix for the same issue 223.
> 

I see, since it looks like a non editorial change, should we open a
ballot for that? Can't we just merge it?

Matias