RE: [PATCH v9 0/1] virtio-media: Add device specification
Parav Pandit <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.virtio-comment |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CY8PR12MB7195B3BA93D4040519D9CB32DC49A@CY8PR12MB7195.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> |
> From: Albert Esteve <[email protected]> > Sent: 09 July 2025 03:31 PM > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 11:49 AM Parav Pandit <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > From: Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen <[email protected]> > > > Sent: 09 July 2025 03:14 PM > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 11:34:55AM +0200, Albert Esteve wrote: > > > > New attempt of including virtio-media device specification. > > > > > > > > v8->v9: > > > > - Rebased to virtio-1.4 > > > > > > I wonder if it wouldn't be better to just send a patch that fixes > > > the series instead of the whole series again. Such a change would be > > > a non editorial change thus not requiring to vote again. The v8 has > > > been already voted and accepted. > > > > > > Matias > > > > > > > Right. I was able to apply v9 without merge conflict. > > Even though, I prefer what Matias suggested to send the fixup patch so that > v9 does not need to go through the review and vote again. > > I'm ok with that. I assumed that as it had no changes from v8 whatsoever, it > would not require a vote. If it does, let's disregard this new version. > If its editorial change, it does not require a vote. > What do you mean for a fixup patch? New patch series with just the > changeset required to eliminate the conflict from v8? > I was looking for something that I apply locally to resolve the merge conflict myself. That way, its basically just v8 + fixup. So basically a short diff that you did manually, which I can also do before merging it.