Re: [oasis-tcs/virtio-spec] Missing struct definitions in GPU device "5.7.6.9 Device Operation: controlq (3d)" (Issue #239)
Manos Pitsidianakis <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Feb 2026 10:30:11 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.virtio-comment |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAjaMXYs+zHdL0w4-LFWZhhZV=6buSAPXVJ4+hWD=cO7utP9TA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 3:16 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 04:36:00AM -0800, Manos Pitsidianakis wrote: > > ●epilys created an issue (oasis-tcs/virtio-spec#239) > > > > These structs are defined in Linux UAPI ^1 but not in the spec, is this an > > oversight or on purpose? > > > > https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/blob/ > > 1ba6e8108644d598cf9c772bac7b856fb5c7df6b/device-types/gpu/description.tex# > > L752-L767 > > > > Should I submit a patch to add these definitions? > > > > Footnotes > > > > 1. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/ > > 0f2acd3148e0ef42bdacbd477f90e8533f96b2ac/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h# > > L296 ↩ > > > > — > > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. > > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.*Message ID: > > <oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/[email protected]> > > > Pls direct all spec comments to the virtio-comments mailing list. > Sending a patch is a great way to start a discussion. Thanks! Thanks for the response Michael, I wasn't sure if this was on purpose or not and did not want to send noise to the list. Will send a patch if nobody objects. -- Manos Pitsidianakis Emulation and Virtualization Engineer at Linaro Ltd