[virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status
"Zhu, Lingshan" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.virtio-dev,dev.linux.lists.virtio-comment |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/18/2023 12:42 PM, Parav Pandit wrote: >> From: [email protected] <[email protected] >> open.org> On Behalf Of Zhu, Lingshan >> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 8:27 AM > >> a new feature bit: VIRTIO_F_RING_SUSPEND_RESET. If this feature bit has been >> negotiated then the device allow reset a vq after SUSPEND. > This is simply a wrong semantics to build to operate individual object after its parent object is suspended. A device can choose to respond to a set of signals and ignore others, right? And, This is not your admin vq based LM solution, therefore there is NO PARENT objects. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]