[virtio-dev] RE: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status

Parav Pandit <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.virtio-dev,dev.linux.lists.virtio-comment
Message-ID <PH0PR12MB5481D3E0B9B8EC0F5626F373DCFBA@PH0PR12MB5481.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> 
> From: Zhu, Lingshan <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 12:09 PM

> > There is parent object.
> > There is VQ which you propose to do SUSPEND_RESET of the parent virtio
> device which is already SUSPENDED.
> that is why we plan to implement a new feature bit to control this behavior.
> 
It does not matter adding a feature bit when the semantics itself is wrong.

> However, in next version, as MST suggested, I will forbid resetting vqs after
> SUSPEND.
Ok. That is good.
I got confused with above proposed bit.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.