[virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status
"Zhu, Lingshan" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.virtio-dev,dev.linux.lists.virtio-comment |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/18/2023 2:46 PM, Parav Pandit wrote: >> From: Zhu, Lingshan <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 12:09 PM >>> There is parent object. >>> There is VQ which you propose to do SUSPEND_RESET of the parent virtio >> device which is already SUSPENDED. >> that is why we plan to implement a new feature bit to control this behavior. >> > It does not matter adding a feature bit when the semantics itself is wrong. > >> However, in next version, as MST suggested, I will forbid resetting vqs after >> SUSPEND. > Ok. That is good. > I got confused with above proposed bit. OK, lets at least close this one --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]