Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 0/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit and vq state
Jason Wang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.virtio-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACGkMEvebT7wWUdEamq0u7d2EOrUsjfdyLW4qu2-78UVs7vj1A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 2:55 PM Parav Pandit <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Zhu, Lingshan <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 12:19 PM > > > > so admin vq based LM solution can be a side channel attacking surface > It will be part of the DSM whenever it will be used in future. > Hence, it is not attack surface. DSM is not a part of TVM. So it really depends on what kind of work did the admin virtqueue do. For commands that can't be self-contained like provisioning, it is fine, since it is done before the TDI assignment. But it not necessarily for your migration proposal. It seems you've found another case that self-containing is important: allowing the owner to access the member after TDI is attached to TVM is a side channel attack. Thanks --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]