Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 0/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit and vq state

Jason Wang <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.virtio-dev
Message-ID <CACGkMEvebT7wWUdEamq0u7d2EOrUsjfdyLW4qu2-78UVs7vj1A@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 2:55 PM Parav Pandit <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: Zhu, Lingshan <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 12:19 PM
>
>
> > so admin vq based LM solution can be a side channel attacking surface
> It will be part of the DSM whenever it will be used in future.
> Hence, it is not attack surface.

DSM is not a part of TVM. So it really depends on what kind of work
did the admin virtqueue do. For commands that can't be self-contained
like provisioning, it is fine, since it is done before the TDI
assignment. But it not necessarily for your migration proposal. It
seems you've found another case that self-containing is important:
allowing the owner to access the member after TDI is attached to TVM
is a side channel attack.

Thanks


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.