Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 0/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit and vq state

On 9/19/2023 4:31 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
>> From: Zhu, Lingshan <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 1:34 PM
>>> In your previous email you wrote,
>>>
>>> 1. "so lets focus on LM topic, other than confidential computing."
>>> 2. "again, TDISP is out of spec and TDISP devices are not migratable."
>>>
>>>   From above two comments from you I understood it that way, you want to
>> focus now on the LM _other_than_ CC.
>>> How to read it differently?
>> You said:"Lingshan wanted to take this TDISP extension in future."
>>
> Based on above two comments from you this is what I understand.
I am not a native speaker, but do you see I ever mentioned that
I want to take TDISP in future? Any verbs I used?
>> How do you conclude this statement? Did I ever said I want to take TDISP
>> extension in future?
> CC and TDISP goes hand in hand.
>
> So you want to consider TDISP extension now (and not in future)?
As I said before, CC and TDISP is out of spec, that means we should 
ignore them for now.
And I don't plan to take TDISP in future, you should not confuse the 
sentences.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]