RE: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [VIRTIO PCI PATCH v5 1/1] transport-pci: Add freeze_mode to virtio_pci_common_cfg
Parav Pandit <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.virtio-dev,dev.linux.lists.virtio-comment,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.nongnu.qemu-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <PH0PR12MB54817E116B756914B3FC1860DCF9A@PH0PR12MB5481.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> |
> From: Zhu, Lingshan <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 1:00 PM > > On 9/20/2023 3:24 PM, Chen, Jiqian wrote: > > Hi Lingshan, > > It seems you reply to the wrong email thread. They are not related to my > patch. > These reply to Parva's comments. > @Parva, if you want to discuss more about live migration, please reply in my > thread, lets don't flood here. You made the point that "this is not live migration". I am not discussing live migration in this thread. I replied for the point that device restoration from suspend for physical and hypevisor based device is not a 40nsec worth of work to restore by just doing a register write. This is not live or device migration. This is restoring the device context initiated by the driver owning the device.