Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] virtio-spi: Add virtio-spi.h
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Aug 2025 06:34:04 -0400
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.virtio-dev,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-spi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 05:19:03PM +0800, Haixu Cui wrote:
>
>
> On 8/21/2025 4:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
>
> > > +
> > > +/* Sample data on trailing clock edge */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_SPI_CPHA _BITUL(0)
> > > +/* Clock is high when IDLE */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_SPI_CPOL _BITUL(1)
> > > +/* Chip Select is active high */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_SPI_CS_HIGH _BITUL(2)
> > > +/* Transmit LSB first */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_SPI_MODE_LSB_FIRST _BITUL(3)
> > > +/* Loopback mode */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_SPI_MODE_LOOP _BITUL(4)
> >
> > It is generally preferable to have an enum with just bit
> > numbers.
> >
> >
> > E.g.
> >
> > enum {
> > VIRTIO_SPI_F_CPHA = 0,
> > }
> >
> >
> > Userspace can add _BITUL wrappers itself if it
> > wants.
> >
> >
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thank you for the suggestion regarding the bit definitions.
>
> Would it be acceptable to keep the current macro definitions with _BITUL()
> because these macros are also used within the virtio SPI driver itself?
>
> Looking forward to your guidance.
>
> Best regards,
> Haixu Cui
>
move them to the .c file if you want them.