Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] vhost-user-blk: make inflight-migration prop mutable
Alexandr Moshkov <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2026 19:07:11 +0500
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.virtio-fs,org.nongnu.qemu-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/29/26 17:13, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 03:56:54PM +0500, Alexandr Moshkov wrote: >> On 7/29/26 15:48, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 03:35:31PM +0500, Alexandr Moshkov wrote: >> >> On 7/29/26 15:14, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 03:09:57PM +0500, Alexandr Moshkov wrote: >> >> On 7/29/26 14:32, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 03:08:39PM +0500, Alexandr Moshkov wrote: >> >> When migrating from a QEMU version that supports inflight-migration to >> an older one that does not, there is no way to disable the feature at >> runtime — the VM must be stopped and reconfigured. This is impractical >> in production environments. >> >> Make the inflight-migration property mutable after device realization >> so it can be toggled via qom-set without restarting the VM. >> >> Acked-by: Raphael Norwitz <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Alexandr Moshkov <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> I think I am beginning to understand. >> >> >> You are running qemu with inflight-migration on and want to migrate >> to qemu without inflight-migration at all. >> >> >> Since it is guest transparent you could retrofit it like this. >> >> My question is why is it worth it, we do not normally support >> migrating between qemu versions with different command lines. >> >> I think you right. Maybe I've been focusing too much on the ability to migrate >> between versions of qemu with and without inflight migration. >> >> This series allows to turn off and on the inflight-migration feature at runtime >> without recreating the VM > restarting you mean. Yes, sorry. > >> (it was the only way to turn off the feature, since >> the protocol feature could no longer be turned off, after initialization with >> the backend). This is more important feature, and it leads to the fact that >> this feature allows to migrate between different versions of qemu (with and >> without inflight-migration support). > so again it's not the 1st feature we have like this. we tie migration > to the machine type and same set of command line flags > specifically to keep things manageable. > > really cross version migration is a pain as it is. I understand that, thanks! Maybe we should focus on the fact that this series allows to turn inflight_migration on and off (without cross version migration) ? Firstly, I wanted to implement this through migration capabilities, but in one of the threads, it was agreed that a separate capability only for vhost-user-blk is not a good idea. Therefore, I implemented it through a parameter that can be changed using qom-set. > >> --- >> hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c | 10 ++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c b/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c >> index e3b873af7c..650c004bde 100644 >> --- a/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c >> +++ b/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c >> @@ -619,6 +619,8 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_vhost_user_blk = { >> } >> }; >> >> +static PropertyInfo vhost_user_blk_inflight_migration_prop; >> + >> static const Property vhost_user_blk_properties[] = { >> DEFINE_PROP_CHR("chardev", VHostUserBlk, chardev), >> DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("num-queues", VHostUserBlk, num_queues, >> @@ -632,8 +634,9 @@ static const Property vhost_user_blk_properties[] = { >> VIRTIO_BLK_F_WRITE_ZEROES, true), >> DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("skip-get-vring-base-on-force-shutdown", VHostUserBlk, >> skip_get_vring_base_on_force_shutdown, false), >> - DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("inflight-migration", VHostUserBlk, >> - inflight_migration, false), >> + DEFINE_PROP("inflight-migration", VHostUserBlk, inflight_migration, >> + vhost_user_blk_inflight_migration_prop, bool, >> + .set_default = true, .defval.u = false), >> }; >> >> static void vhost_user_blk_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, const void *data) >> @@ -665,6 +668,9 @@ static const TypeInfo vhost_user_blk_info = { >> >> static void virtio_register_types(void) >> { >> + vhost_user_blk_inflight_migration_prop = qdev_prop_bool; >> + vhost_user_blk_inflight_migration_prop.realized_set_allowed = true; >> + >> type_register_static(&vhost_user_blk_info); >> } >> >> So then, for example, let us say I paused the VM, then set the flag, >> now inflight is on but GET_BASE did not drain it? >> >> If I understood the question correctly, this is valid behavior. Before >> migration QEMU check protocol features to understand does the backend support >> inflight migration. If it does, after that QEMU migrate inflight buffer to >> other VM. If it's not, return error before migration started. >> >> I apologise i reverted the logic in the question. >> >> >> I start vm and inflight is on. >> I stop vm get base does not drain. >> >> In case of VM stop, backend wait to drain all requests. Ability to perform >> drain or not available only during migration by skip_drain variable in >> vhost_user_blk_stop(). >> >> What if it was migration but it failed? >> >> If migration failed, source vm just keep using inflight region, backend >> continue to execute inflight requests that was tried to migrate. > > Sorry, to be more clear. I mean migration succeeded but destination failed to > start, so now vm is stopped and we are now trying migrating to a different destination. Is this a real case? I was thinking in case of any destination errors (migration process or starting), source vm has to work... I guess in that case, inflight requests can only be executed on different destination or in current destination if vm be able to start. > IIUC currently on VM stop we simply send GET_BASE and this stops > backend, and depending on features things remain in the inflight buffer. > Correct me if I am wrong. Yes backend has to disconnect from QEMU.. So it not be changing guest memory. > > I think that we do not want a slow flush on vm stop if we > can avoid it, and we also do not want backend to keep changing > guest memory when VM is stopped. No? Yes, it is >> >> skip_drain true only if inflight_migration is on and runstate is >> FINISH_MIGRATION. > FINISH_MIGRATE? actually i do not see where it affects it. Sorry, I didn't understand) Who affects who? > >> This btw I don't much like, a stopped VM would preferably >> behave the same whatever the reason to stop. >> >> Well, I don't see any other way to implement this. > > I am not 100% sure it's implementable as described, but I guess > you could block changing the property if VM and thus the backend > is not connected and running. > > > Which is even more complexity but at least it is consistent. Oh, I understand what you thinking about. I agreed, but why implementation (in this series) is not consistent? I was thinking that current (in current qemu version) impl is not, because GET_VRING_BASE has two behaviors, depending on the presence of the protocol feature (drain or not drain requests). Now, I think it would be more clear: one message for drain GET_VRING_BASE (as it was before), one for not drain GET_VRING_BASE_SKIP_DRAIN. > > > > > > >> I think backend must perform >> drain in all cases except live migration with all the necessary checks >> (protocol features, special message GET_VRING_BASE_SKIP_DRAIN). > > This is not what is going on now, right? Whether it drains depends > on protocol features not on VM state and I think we should > keep it like this. Well yes, now in current qemu version drain or not drain depends on protocol feature only, that try to be negotiated only if inflight_migration is set on. In patch: in case live migration (if protocol feature and device param) sent message GET_VRING_BASE_SKIP_DRAIN to skip drain, in other cases sent other message - GET_VRING_BASE with draining all requests. So drain or not drain depends on message that QEMU send to backend. > > >> >> i turn inflight off. >> now it looks like it will happily migrate? >> >> So in this case, when vm migrated with inflight off, it will leads to using >> GET_VRING_BASE message, that wait all requests to be drained. >> >> >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> >> > > i mean it migrated with on. vm was stopped then it flipped to off. After stop vm will send GET_VRING_BASE to backend, that lead to drain all requests. Non of the inflight requests will be missed here, If that's what you mean. > > > > >