Re: [PATCH RFC 02/15] vhost-user: Add memory-isolation qdev property to vhost-user devices
Hanna Czenczek <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 14:21:11 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.virtio-fs,org.nongnu.qemu-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 24.07.26 00:30, ConKite wrote: > In support of future work to add a memory isolation mode to vhost-user devices, a > qdev property, "memory-isolation", is added to all vhost-user devices. This is > simply a bool representing whether the mode is active or not. > > Signed-off-by: Connor Kite <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]> > --- > hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c | 1 + > hw/display/vhost-user-gpu.c | 1 + > hw/scsi/vhost-user-scsi.c | 1 + > hw/virtio/vhost-user-base.c | 3 ++- > hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs.c | 1 + > hw/virtio/vhost-user-scmi.c | 1 + > hw/virtio/vhost-user-vsock.c | 1 + > include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-base.h | 1 + > include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-blk.h | 1 + > include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs.h | 1 + > include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-scmi.h | 1 + > include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-vsock.h | 1 + > include/hw/virtio/virtio-gpu.h | 1 + > include/hw/virtio/virtio-scsi.h | 1 + > 14 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Should `vhost_user_vga_inst_initfn()` set up an alias for "memory-isolation", like it does for "chardev" now? There are four lines in here that the checkpatch script notes to be over 80 characters in length, so they should be broken up. [...] > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user-base.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user-base.c > index 90bd2903db..d2a74a2860 100644 > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user-base.c > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user-base.c > @@ -409,7 +409,8 @@ static void vub_device_unrealize(DeviceState *dev) > > /*Define common qdev properties. Inherited by all children*/ > static const Property vub_properties[] = { > - DEFINE_PROP_CHR("chardev", VHostUserBase, chardev) > + DEFINE_PROP_CHR("chardev", VHostUserBase, chardev), > + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("memory-isolation", VHostUserBase, memory_isolation, false) Nitpick: I would add a comma here. (This hunk shows specifically why it’s a good idea: So that future additions don’t have to change the line to add the comma.) Hanna