Re: [RFCv2 PATCH 0/6] Support memory hotplug/unplug for TDX CoCo guests
"Pratik R. Sampat" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.virtualization,dev.linux.lists.linux-coco,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/27/26 4:18 AM, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [RFCv2 PATCH 0/6] Support memory hotplug/unplug for TDX CoCo >> guests >> >> On 6/23/26 12:17, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: >>> This RFCv2 series implements comprehensive support for virtio-mem and ACPI >>> DIMM memory hotplug/unplug in Intel TDX confidential computing guests. >>> It explores the start-private memory approach utilizing the native >>> TDG.MEM.PAGE.RELEASE API. >>> >>> We are seeking feedback from Kiryl on the CoCo guest implementation, MM >>> experts on DIMM & virio-mem memory hotplug integration and broader >>> virtio/CoCo community input on the overall approach. We are not seeking >>> x86 maintainer review at this stage. >>> >>> == Changes from RFC v1 == >>> >>> - Eliminated callback infrastructure: Dropped plug callback and replaced >>> unplug callback with platform-level unaccept function into core MM >>> hotplug and virtio-mem subsystems. >>> - Added comprehensive bitmap tracking: Introduced a "plugged" bitmap >>> alongside the unaccepted bitmap to track populated hotplug memory >>> states to support load_unaligned_zeropad(). >>> - Enhanced SRAT parsing: Extended the EFI stub to parse ACPI SRAT tables >>> early, ensuring hotpluggable ranges are tracked from initial boot. >>> >>> For more introduction about the background or other efforts in community, >>> please check the RFCv1 cover letter [1]. >>> >>> == Technical Approach == >>> >>> - Early SRAT Integration: A lightweight EFI stub parser scans ACPI SRAT >>> tables to identify hotpluggable ranges and adjust bitmap boundaries >>> early, avoiding the overhead of the full ACPI subsystem. >>> - Comprehensive Bitmap Tracking: Introduces a "plugged" bitmap right >>> after the unaccepted bitmap. Both static and hotplugged memory are >>> tracked, allowing the guest to map which ranges are populated by the >>> VMM. This prevents acceptance beyond plugged memory boundaries due to >>> load_unaligned_zeropad() operations. >>> - Platform Extensibility: Exposes generic CoCo memory interfaces. Other >>> confidential platforms (like AMD SEV-SNP) can easily adopt this by >>> hooking their specific mechanisms into arch_unaccept_memory(). >>> - Hotplug & Guest Control: Integrates platform-level unaccept logic >>> into ACPI hotplug and virtio-mem handlers. Uses TDG.MEM.PAGE.RELEASE >>> for TDX to explicitly set memory to the "unaccepted" state during >>> unplug, removing host hole-punching dependencies. >>> - Kexec Handover: Leverages existing EFI mechanisms to seamlessly hand >>> over both the extended unaccepted bitmap and the new plugged bitmap >>> across kexec boundaries. >>> >>> == Testing == >>> >>> - dimm and virtio-mem memory hotplug/unplug >>> - lazy and eager accept >>> - kexec/kdump with hotplugged memory >>> >>> This is tested with Marc-André Lureau's newest qemu series [2] >> >> What's the status of this? > > Marc's QEMU series is merged. > For this series, following feedback from Kirill and Pratik, the preferred approach > is updating the UEFI spec for hotplug memory ranges rather than parsing SRAT > at the EFI stage. Pratik is already pushing this forward, I am currently waiting on > his RFCs. If he hasn't taken over the entire implementation, I can rebase my > remaining patches on top of his work. > > Hi Pratik, have you sent your UEFI RFC out yet? Just wanted to make sure > I didn't miss your thread. > Yes, the RFC has been out for a bit: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/12811 The general feedback I've received is that folks are wary of adding yet another attribute to support hotplug memory (beyond EFI_MEMORY_SP and EFI_MEMORY_HOT_PLUGGABLE), and that they're waiting for more community input before moving forward. In hindsight, I should probably have pinged here as well since folks on this thread are more adept to review. Thanks, --Pratik