Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/cacheinfo: Properly parse CPUID(0x80000005) L1d/L1i associativity

* Ahmed S. Darwish <[email protected]> wrote:

> For the AMD CPUID(4) emulation cache info logic, the same associativity
> mapping array, assocs[], is used for both CPUID(0x80000005) and
> CPUID(0x80000006).
> 
> This is incorrect since per the AMD manuals, the mappings for
> CPUID(0x80000005) L1d/L1i associativity is:
> 
>    n = 0x1 -> 0xfe	n
>    n = 0xff		fully associative
> 
> while assocs[] maps these values to:
> 
>    n = 0x1, 0x2, 0x4	n
>    n = 0x3, 0x7, 0x9	0
>    n = 0x6		8
>    n = 0x8		16
>    n = 0xa		32
>    n = 0xb		48
>    n = 0xc		64
>    n = 0xd		96
>    n = 0xe		128
>    n = 0xf		fully associative
> 
> which is only valid for CPUID(0x80000006).
> 
> Parse CPUID(0x80000005) L1d/L1i associativity values as shown in the AMD
> manuals.  Since the 0xffff literal is used to denote full associativity
> at the AMD CPUID(4)-emulation logic, define AMD_CPUID4_FULLY_ASSOCIATIVE
> for it instead of spreading that literal in more places.
> 
> Mark the assocs[] mapping array as only valid for CPUID(0x80000006) L2/L3
> cache information.
> 
> Fixes: a326e948c538 ("x86, cacheinfo: Fixup L3 cache information for AMD multi-node processors")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <[email protected]>

Yeah, so a Cc: stable tag is usually reserved for recent regressions, 
or critical fixes - but this is a bug from 2009, ~16 years old. This 
bug is old enough to receive a driving license in the US, and can 
legally buy beer or wine in Germany.

So I've removed the tags from the two commits in tip:x86/cpu, but note 
that the Fixes tag itself will give backporters enough information so 
they can decide on whether to backport. Greg's -stable process 
typically processes all Fixes tags for example, once Linus pulls this 
into v6.16-to-be.

Thanks,

	Ingo