[PATCH v1 02/26] x86/cpu: Sanitize CPUID(0x80000000) output

"Ahmed S. Darwish" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.x86-cpuid,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
CPUID(0x80000000).EAX returns the max extended CPUID leaf available.  On
x86-32 machines without an extended CPUID range, a CPUID(0x80000000)
query will just repeat the output of the last valid standard CPUID leaf
on the CPU; i.e., a garbage values.  Current x86/cpu code protects against
this by doing:

	eax = cpuid_eax(0x80000000);
	c->extended_cpuid_level = eax;

	if ((eax & 0xffff0000) == 0x80000000) {
		// CPU has an extended CPUID range. Check for 0x80000001
		if (eax >= 0x80000001) {
			cpuid(0x80000001, ...);
		}
	}

This is correct so far.  Afterwards though, the same possibly broken EAX
value is used to check the availability of other extended CPUID leaves:

	if (c->extended_cpuid_level >= 0x80000007)
		...
	if (c->extended_cpuid_level >= 0x80000008)
		...
	if (c->extended_cpuid_level >= 0x8000000a)
		...
	if (c->extended_cpuid_level >= 0x8000001f)
		...

which is invalid.  Fix this by immediately setting the CPU's max extended
CPUID leaf to zero if CPUID(0x80000000).EAX doesn't indicate a valid
CPUID extended range.

While at it, add a comment, similar to kernel/head_32.S, clarifying the
CPUID(0x80000000) sanity check.

Fixes: 3da99c977637 ("x86: make (early)_identify_cpu more the same between 32bit and 64 bit")
References: 8a50e5135af0 ("x86-32: Use symbolic constants, safer CPUID when enabling EFER.NX")
Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <[email protected]>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 4ada55f126ae..e5734df3b4a1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1005,17 +1005,18 @@ void get_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		c->x86_capability[CPUID_D_1_EAX] = eax;
 	}
 
-	/* AMD-defined flags: level 0x80000001 */
+	/*
+	 * Check if extended CPUID leaves are implemented: Max extended
+	 * CPUID leaf must be in the 0x80000001-0x8000ffff range.
+	 */
 	eax = cpuid_eax(0x80000000);
-	c->extended_cpuid_level = eax;
+	c->extended_cpuid_level = ((eax & 0xffff0000) == 0x80000000) ? eax : 0;
 
-	if ((eax & 0xffff0000) == 0x80000000) {
-		if (eax >= 0x80000001) {
-			cpuid(0x80000001, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+	if (c->extended_cpuid_level >= 0x80000001) {
+		cpuid(0x80000001, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
 
-			c->x86_capability[CPUID_8000_0001_ECX] = ecx;
-			c->x86_capability[CPUID_8000_0001_EDX] = edx;
-		}
+		c->x86_capability[CPUID_8000_0001_ECX] = ecx;
+		c->x86_capability[CPUID_8000_0001_EDX] = edx;
 	}
 
 	if (c->extended_cpuid_level >= 0x80000007) {
-- 
2.49.0
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.