Re: [PATCH v7 004/120] x86/cpuid: Introduce <asm/cpuid/leaf_types.h>
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Jun 2026 23:24:54 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.x86-cpuid,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ah34pi6j5HSMJdrL@lx-t490> |
On Mon, 01 Jun 2026, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 09:53:32PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote: > > I'm doing another iteration of this PQ this week, along with a minor > > x86-cpuid-db release to fix those couple of fields. > > Maciej found it and I'd like to give him the credit for it. So Maciej please > do a patch ontop of current tip:x86/cpu so that I can pick it up. > Maciej should first send a patch to x86-cpuid-db.¹ Then the header generated by the tool can be submitted on top of tip:x86/cpu. This is for example how it was done in the merged commits: 49394b5af45c tools/x86/kcpuid: Update bitfields to x86-cpuid-db v2.4 300ba891418a tools/x86/kcpuid: Update bitfields to x86-cpuid-db v2.3 5e0c3c5e95f0 tools/x86/kcpuid: Update bitfields to x86-cpuid-db v2.2 ... One component of this work is that you and the other x86 maintainers will enforce that "auto generated header" rule; unless something really urgent pops up and common sense applies. But a single, yet unused, bitfield spelling mistak is not that urgent to warrant breaking the rule from the get go. ¹ https://gitlab.com/x86-cpuid.org/x86-cpuid-db/-/blob/tip/CONTRIBUTING.rst Thanks, Ahmed