Re: Kernel WARNING in Xenomai3 with RTnet
Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.xenomai |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 08.04.26 22:53, Hannes Diethelm wrote: > Configuration: > > Debian Trixie > xenomai3:master > linux-dovetail:v6.12.67-dovetail1 > > I have the following warning as soon as I enable the network interface: > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: memcpy: detected field-spanning write > (size 80) of single field "call->priv_data" at drivers/xenomai/net/ > stack/rtnet_rtpc.c:93 (size 0) > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 2480 at > drivers/xenomai/net/stack/rtnet_rtpc.c:93 > rtnet_rtpc_dispatch_call+0x2df/0x3d0 [rtnet] > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: Modules linked in: rtudp rtipv4 > rt_loopback joydev uinput qrtr rfkill binfmt_misc intel_rapl_msr > intel_rapl_common ccp kvm snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_intel ir> > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: CPU: 13 UID: 0 PID: 2480 Comm: rtping > Not tainted 6.12.67-xenomai3-73ad3b #3 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 > + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: IRQ stage: Linux > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: RIP: > 0010:rtnet_rtpc_dispatch_call+0x2df/0x3d0 [rtnet] > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: Code: 26 50 00 00 00 0f 85 d1 fd ff > ff 31 c9 48 c7 c2 00 13 94 c0 4c 89 ee 48 c7 c7 48 13 94 c0 c6 05 06 50 > 00 00 01 e8 51 d6 97 eb <0f> 0b e9 ab fd ff ff 84 d2 > > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffcdff82ebbd68 EFLAGS: > 00010286 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: > ffff8988585012c0 RCX: 0000000000000027 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: RDX: ffff898b6fca0948 RSI: > 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff898b6fca0940 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: RBP: 00000000000001f4 R08: > 0000000000000000 R09: ffffcdff82ebbb28 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: R10: ffffffffadeb9ee8 R11: > 0000000000000003 R12: 0000000000000000 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: R13: 0000000000000050 R14: > ffffffffc0cff5b0 R15: ffffffffc0cff6e0 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: FS: 00007f1499d11740(0000) > GS:ffff898b6fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: > 0000000080050033 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: CR2: 00007ffe3de7dff8 CR3: > 000000014d74e000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: PKRU: 55555554 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: Call Trace: > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: <TASK> > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: ipv4_ioctl+0x16b/0x230 [rtipv4] > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: rtnet_ioctl+0x164/0x190 [rtnet] > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: ? __count_memcg_events+0x67/0x100 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: __x64_sys_ioctl+0x91/0xd0 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: do_syscall_64+0xc0/0x230 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7f1499e2091b > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d > 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 > 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <89> c2 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 1c > > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffe3de7e9f0 EFLAGS: > 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: > 00007f1499d11740 RCX: 00007f1499e2091b > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: RDX: 000055c8e00d60e0 RSI: > 00000000c0500285 RDI: 0000000000000003 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: > 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: R10: 0000000000000003 R11: > 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffe3de7f818 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: R13: 0000000000000002 R14: > 00007f1499f60000 R15: 000055c8e00d5dd8 > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: </TASK> > Apr 08 01:52:12 trixie-box kernel: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > This can be fixed with the following patch. However, I am not sure if > it's the right way to do it. > diff --git a/kernel/drivers/net/stack/rtnet_rtpc.c b/kernel/drivers/net/ > stack/rtnet_rtpc.c > index cd5f0546d..caed27269 100644 > --- a/kernel/drivers/net/stack/rtnet_rtpc.c > +++ b/kernel/drivers/net/stack/rtnet_rtpc.c > @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ int rtnet_rtpc_dispatch_call(rtpc_proc proc, unsigned > int timeout, > if (call == NULL) > return -ENOMEM; > > - memcpy(call->priv_data, priv_data, priv_data_size); > + unsafe_memcpy(call->priv_data, priv_data, priv_data_size, / > *embedded variable length data*/); > Yeah, good catch - the kernel and the toolchains improved their diagnosis features a lot since this was written more than 20 years ago. I bet we have a few more of those variable length fields in RTnet data structures. Those should be converted to flexible array members, see also https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays. Happy to review patches! Jan > call->processed = 0; > call->proc = proc; > > -- Siemens AG, Foundational Technologies Linux Expert Center