Re: Dovetail 7.1-rc6 updates pushed
Florian Bezdeka <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.xenomai |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2026-06-01 at 15:43 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: > Florian Bezdeka <[email protected]> writes: > > > Hi all, > > > > I just pushed the following branch updates for Dovetail based on 7.1- > > rc6: > > > > Dovetail: > > wip/flo/v7.1-dovetail-rebase > > wip/flo/v7.1-dovetail-rebase+riscv > > > > Evl: > > wip/flo/v7.1-evl-rebase > > wip/flo/v7.1-evl-rebase+riscv > > > > The +riscv branches are containing v8 of Tobias' riscv enabling series, > > maybe we need v9, let's see. > > > > Any additional testing on those branches is highly appreciated. > > > > @Philippe: > > I'm still waiting for some feedback for [1]. That seems now to be a > > invalid combination of kconfigs, which is dovetail specific. Upstream > > thread at [2]. > > > > Can you remember why KVM_INTEL is not selecting X86_FRED in case > > IRQ_PIPELINE is enabled? I haven't checked the details yet, nor tried to > > remove the dovetail specific adjustment. > > > > Maybe because the pipeline never supported X86_FRED, doing so would > required to rework the irq-entry trampoline macros, which is deemed > painful work. I sent out a RFC patch for that, input welcome. Meanwhile I can provide some updates on the testing part. The following problems seem to be reproducible on 7.1-rc5 and 7.1-rc6 - while 7.1-rc4 was fine (at least once): x86 x3: Test timeout. Something seems slower than expected. arm64 x4: Same problem To rule out problems in our CI setup I spawned some 7.0 tests, which were fine, at least twice in a row. Seems someone has to look into that. As I'm running out of time: Any resources available? Best regards, Florian