Re: [PATCH linux-evl 0/2] Add RISC-V support to EVL
Tobias Schaffner <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Jul 2026 08:26:04 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.xenomai |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/8/26 08:07, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 08.07.26 07:17, Tobias Schaffner wrote: >> On 7/8/26 00:30, Florian Bezdeka wrote: >>> On Fri, 2025-10-10 at 12:10 +0200, Tobias Schaffner wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> this series introduces an initial EVL port for RISC-V. >>>> >>>> While some tests are still failing, I’d like to share this early >>>> version with the community to gather feedback, reviews, and hopefully >>>> some assistance in refining the port. >>>> >>>> The patches have been tested in combination with the Dovetail RISC-V >>>> port on top of v6.12-evl1-rebase. >>>> >>>> Looking forward to your feedback and suggestions. >>>> >>> >>> I tried to apply this series today, and run into the following issues >>> reported by my tooling. >>> >>> Patch 1 is fine, patch 2 has some checkpatch findings. >>> >>> A couple of debatable warnings like: >>> >>> WARNING: Misplaced SPDX-License-Identifier tag - use line 1 instead >>> #58: FILE: arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/evl/fptest.h:2: >>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note >>> >>> WARNING: unnecessary whitespace before a quoted newline >>> #95: FILE: arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/evl/fptest.h:34: >>> + >>> >>> In addition to a serious one: >>> >>> ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author 'shannmu >>> <[email protected]>' >> >> I did not get any responses from this email anymore. I can try to reach >> out to him one last time, but what do we do about it if he will not >> reply? >> > > If I read that patch correctly, it's majority is taken from the > corresponding Xenomai 3 logic. How much is unique contribution, how much > was your work, Tobias? I added the evl_set_fpregs/evl_check_fpregs content which is a translation from what Gilles Chanteperdrix <[email protected]> did for the x86 and arm architectures with some isa enablement bits added. This should be the initial version by shanmu where I added this on top: https://github.com/shannmu/linux/blob/xenomai4/wip/dovetail-riscv/evl_port/arch/riscv/include/asm/evl/fptest.h Best, Tobias > Jan > >>> My perspective: We definitely need that. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Florian >> >> >