Re: [PATCH] irqchip: gic-v3-its: irq_pipeline: Fix OOB context in-band lock warning for ITS lock
Florian Bezdeka <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Jul 2026 12:59:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.xenomai |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 2026-07-10 at 12:12 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 25.06.26 11:32, linz wrote: > > Hi, I find a call trace when I use v6.6.y-dovetail + xenomai v3.3 branch, the call trace is as follows > > > > [ 1.510903] IRQ pipeline: some code running in oob context 'Xenomai' > > called an in-band only routine > > [ 1.510912] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G S 6.6.63-dovetail2 #8 > > [ 1.510918] Hardware name: Pe2204 DEMO DDR4 (DT) > > [ 1.510920] IRQ stage: Xenomai > > [ 1.510923] Call trace: > > [ 1.510926] dump_backtrace+0x90/0xe4 > > [ 1.510940] show_stack+0x14/0x1c > > [ 1.510946] dump_stack_lvl+0x84/0xc8 > > [ 1.510953] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c > > [ 1.510957] check_inband_stage+0xb0/0xc8 > > [ 1.510965] inband_irq_save+0xc/0x28 > > [ 1.510971] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x14/0x90 > > [ 1.510977] its_send_single_command+0x24/0x154 > > [ 1.510984] lpi_update_config+0x9c/0x144 > > [ 1.510990] its_mask_irq+0x2c/0x64 > > [ 1.510997] irq_chip_mask_parent+0x18/0x20 > > [ 1.511005] its_mask_msi_irq+0x1c/0x28 > > [ 1.511012] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x1cc/0x2b4 > > [ 1.511016] generic_pipeline_irq_desc+0x6c/0xa4 > > [ 1.511021] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x18/0x20 > > [ 1.511028] gic_handle_irq+0x4c/0x120 > > [ 1.511032] handle_irq_pipelined+0x40/0x64 > > [ 1.511038] call_on_irq_stack+0x24/0x30 > > [ 1.511044] do_interrupt_handler+0x138/0x158 > > [ 1.511050] el1_interrupt+0x40/0x110 > > [ 1.511055] el1h_64_irq_handler+0x14/0x1c > > [ 1.511061] el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68 > > [ 1.511064] default_idle_call+0x30/0x78 > > [ 1.511071] do_idle+0x128/0x150 > > [ 1.511077] cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x38 > > [ 1.511081] kernel_init+0x0/0x1d4 > > [ 1.511088] arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x8 > > [ 1.511096] start_kernel+0x504/0x5cc > > [ 1.511103] __primary_switched+0xbc/0xc4 > > > > > > The function call causing the issue is as follows: > > generic_handle_domain_irq > > => generic_pipeline_irq_desc > > => generic_handle_irq_desc > > => handle_fasteoi_irq > > => mask_cond_eoi_irq > > => mask_irq > > => its_mask_msi_irq > > => irq_chip_mask_parent > > => its_mask_irq > > => lpi_update_config > > => its_send_inv > > => BUILD_SINGLE_CMD_FUNC > > => raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&its->lock, flags); > > > > > > On Dovetail-enabled kernels with Xenomai IRQ pipeline, GICv3 ITS interrupt handling runs in OOB (out-of-band) interrupt context. The original raw_spinlock_t used for its_node->lock invokes the standard in-band-only raw_spin_lock_irqsave() interface. > > This triggers the following pipeline context violation warning: IRQ pipeline: some code running in oob context 'Xenomai' called an in-band only routine > > > > raw_spin_lock_irqsave() is an in-band exclusive API and cannot be safely called from Xenomai OOB interrupt context, which violates the IRQ pipeline isolation rules. > > > > I think that fix this by replacing raw_spinlock_t with hybrid_spinlock_t for the ITS node lock. The hybrid spinlock supports both in-band Linux kernel context and OOB Xenomai pipeline context, adapting lock/irqsave logic dynamically according to the running context, eliminating the context mismatch warning while guaranteeing lock mutual exclusion. > > > > The fixed up patch is as follows: > > > > From 1037fcf6d75ecf37e1caf283d1198177e7410be3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: zhanglin <[email protected]> > > Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 16:56:31 +0800 > > Subject: [PATCH] irqchip: gic-v3-its: irq_pipeline: fix OOB context in-band > > lock warning for ITS lock > > > > --- > > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > > index 0e57735eac..847b008b71 100644 > > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ struct its_device; > > * list. > > */ > > struct its_node { > > - raw_spinlock_t lock; > > + hybrid_spinlock_t lock; > > struct mutex dev_alloc_lock; > > struct list_head entry; > > void __iomem *base; > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > > > Please help to review it, thank you. > > Thanks for reporting. > > Philippe, Florian, any comments on this? > > Jan hybrid_spinlock_t doesn't look right at first glance, it's use should be limited to struct irq_desc and IRQ chips. I would have expected hard_spinlock_t, but I might miss something. Assuming the gic-v3 IRQ chip is already marked / flagged as IRQCHIP_PIPELINE_SAFE, right? Florian