Re: [PATCH 6.6 0/4] fix kernel crash for xfs/235 test
Hamza Mahfooz <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:31:41 -0400
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.xfs-stable,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ajFQPY2m2A6ltvTH@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> |
Cc: [email protected] On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 09:13:45AM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 03:19:24PM -0400, Hamza Mahfooz wrote: > > Cc: Carlos Maiolino <[email protected]> > > FWIW I don't maintain the stable trees I really don't have time for > that. Darrick/Leah have been doing a best effort case for that, but > again, this is mostly a best effort so we shouldn't expect them to be > looking/picking up every single possible patch suggested for stable. > Now that you mention it, the xfs-stable mailing list seems to be pretty much dead (i.e. the last time fixes from it were merged into stable was almost a year ago). I guess no one is really working on it anymore? > > > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 08:20:34PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2026 at 02:39:03PM -0400, Hamza Mahfooz wrote: > > > > Any idea what happened to this series? It resolves an issue that I've > > > > hit in a production environment FWIW. > > > > > > > > Series is: > > > > > > > > Tested-by: Hamza Mahfooz <[email protected]> > > > > > > Thanks for the nudge, and thanks Fedor for putting the backport together. > > > > > > We generally don't take XFS backports without a maintainer signing off on them, > > > so right now we're waiting for one to do so :) > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks, > > > Sasha