Re: [PATCH 6.6 0/4] fix kernel crash for xfs/235 test
"Darrick J. Wong" <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Jun 2026 11:34:21 -0700
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.xfs-stable,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260625183421.GO6070@frogsfrogsfrogs> |
On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 02:31:01PM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 11:19:25AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 7:33 PM Leah Rumancik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I have changed teams so I no longer work on kernel and I don't believe > > > my xfs maintenance work was backfilled ;( > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 7:19 AM Carlos Maiolino <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 09:31:41AM -0400, Hamza Mahfooz wrote: > > > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 09:13:45AM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 03:19:24PM -0400, Hamza Mahfooz wrote: > > > > > > > Cc: Carlos Maiolino <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > FWIW I don't maintain the stable trees I really don't have time for > > > > > > that. Darrick/Leah have been doing a best effort case for that, but > > > > > > again, this is mostly a best effort so we shouldn't expect them to be > > > > > > looking/picking up every single possible patch suggested for stable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now that you mention it, the xfs-stable mailing list seems to be pretty > > > > > much dead (i.e. the last time fixes from it were merged into stable was > > > > > almost a year ago). I guess no one is really working on it anymore? > > > > > > > > IIRC Darrick started it, I personally never worked on it, but I didn't > > > > follow the evolution there. > > > > I think at this point we can officially declare xfs in stable <= 6.6 > > unmaintained > > maybe need to send patches to LTS MAINTAINERS. > > > > The best chance in this case to apply the requested fix to 6.6.y is that the > > author (Darrick) approves it. > > Unfortunately this might be true. But let's wait for Darrick's input > please. He's on vacations this week so will be unfair to make any > decisions in this matter without his input. > Also he has been still poking people to tag patches with LTS versions > so even though he might not me dealing with the xfs-stable, he might still > be driving work on LTS trees. I've really only been doing QA work on 6.12/6.18 LTS. Ted Tso might still be doing the older ones. Catherine left Oracle last year. --D