Re: [cocci] Searching for switch statements with SmPL?
Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | fr.inria.cocci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 8 Nov 2025, at 09:37, Markus Elfring <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>> Under which circumstances will such data processing become better supported? >> None. All cases are directly attached to the { of the switch, like if branches are attached to an if header. So the nest doesn’t make sense. > > I hope that better common understanding can be achieved for more desirable > software behaviour also according to such a feedback. > > Which SmPL script variant would you find more reasonable for the mentioned > use case? > Just remove the <+… …+> > Regards, > Markus