Re: [cocci] Avoiding duplicate elements in SmPL disjunctions?

Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
Newsgroups fr.inria.cocci
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
>> Do test results indicate that data processing for isomorphisms is still so erroneous
>> that this functionality should be deactivated until the implementation quality
>> will really be acceptable?
> 
> The implementation quality is fine.

I got an other impression.


> No one has complained for the last 15 years.

Am I a contributor who presented relevant bug reports?

How will development interests (and resources) evolve further?

Regards,
Markus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.