Re: [cocci] Data processing challenges with usage of not operators
Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | fr.inria.cocci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> How reasonable do you find the conversion of such a simple test expression > into an SmPL disjunction with 15 branches by isomorphism rules? How does the generated SmPL disjunction look after the software adjustment “avoid duplicates in disjunctions” (from 2025-11-23)? https://gitlab.inria.fr/coccinelle/coccinelle/-/commit/5bf4aac3af21712638005c0f4e225fb37c2fd70f https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/commit/5bf4aac3af21712638005c0f4e225fb37c2fd70f How long will I wait until I can see a corresponding data processing result myself? Regards, Markus