Re: [cocci] Can we match a known macro by macro name instead of expanded function name?

> .cocci
> 
> @r@
> symbol SYSCALL_DEFINE1;
> identifier fn;
> type t;

Is this metavariable unused in the SmPL code?


> .c
> 
> SYSCALL_DEFINE1(foo,int,x) { return 0; }

How can a macro call be matched here?


> Using * was a bad idea.  You can't transform macro expanded code.

Would any more background information become relevant here?

Regards,
Markus