Re: [cocci] Matching a specific declarer?
Tobias Deiminger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | fr.inria.cocci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 01.12.2025 17:00 schrieb Markus Elfring: > [...] >> but actually stumbled upon the issue in a simpler case: I searched for >> all occurrences of DEVICE_ATTR_RO(attr) in the Linux kernel, > > Will it become more interesting to clarify your own source code search > approaches? Sorry, not sure I understand the question. Is there anything I should do, or should avoid to do, or tell about? If I manage to compile meaningful results until next week, I maybe add some words about the code search approach to my LPC talk: https://lpc.events/event/19/contributions/2198/ >> but actually found every place where *any* macro was used to declare >> something. > > Would you be looking for any better documentation also in this > application area? You mean better Coccinelle documentation? I think it's ok. This list is very responsive and helpful, that more than compensates for gaps in documentation, if any. Also my use case is in the niche of a niche, so really not demanding anything. >> PS: I'm using spatch 1.3 from Debian trixie. > > It might become also interesting with which delay subsequent software > tool revisions > will be usable. Which revisions of which tool do you mean? Tobias