Re: [cocci] Reconsidering source code search challenges for nested compound statements
Julia Lawall <[email protected]> Sun, 8 Mar 2026 18:46:16 +0100 (CET)
| Newsgroups | fr.inria.cocci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Can you see concrete change opportunities from my recent test results? > >> > >> 1. Inappropriate difference output > >> https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/[email protected]/ > >> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2026-03/msg00004.html > > There is a problem here. > > Thanks for such a feedback finally. > > > >> 2. Questionable hierarchy level > >> https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/[email protected]/ > >> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2026-03/msg00015.html > > This is the message I was referring to. I have no idea what you expect as > > the output. > > I presented another test result for further development considerations. > > > > > I don't know why it is so hard to provide that information. > > I imagine that corresponding case distinctions can become also more interesting. > > A) C++ test variant: > Markus_Elfring@Sonne:…/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> /usr/bin/spatch --c++ test-item_assignments.c ../janitor/show_compound_statements.cocci > … > @@ -3,9 +3,6 @@ void my_test(void) > int item; > > if (1) > - { > - item = 1; > - } > > item = 2; > } > > > Should declarations belong also to statements then? > https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/statements.html#Declaration_statements > https://gitlab.inria.fr/coccinelle/coccinelle/-/blob/233b5ceb1d5a701fb270ebdf0a9bd6be0a6ce53b/docs/manual/cocci_syntax.tex#L348-350 > > > B) SmPL script variant: > > @display2@ > declaration d; > statement list sl; > @@ > { > d > *sl > } > > Questionable test result: > Markus_Elfring@Sonne:…/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor> /usr/bin/spatch --parse-cocci show_compound_statements2.cocci > … > minus: parse error: > File "show_compound_statements2.cocci", line 7, column 2, charpos = 56 > around = 'sl', > whole content = *sl > > > How should this implementation detail be improved anyhow? By putting the * in the leftmost column where it belongs. julia > > Regards, > Markus >