Re: [cocci] [PATCH] docs/dev-tools: fix a broken URL in dev-tools/coccinelle.rst
Haoyang Liu <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:28:23 +0800
| Newsgroups | fr.inria.cocci,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.workflows |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/10/2026 12:10 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > LIU Haoyang <[email protected]> writes: > >> The original supplemental documentation for coccicheck is >> https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck, which redirects to a not found page, >> thus change it to https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html, >> which adds a suffix to original URL to make it direct to the right page. >> >> Signed-off-by: LIU Haoyang <[email protected]> >> --- >> Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst >> index 2b942e3c8049..f73ccf5397f3 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst >> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Supplemental documentation >> >> For supplemental documentation refer to the wiki: >> >> -https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck >> +https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html >> >> The wiki documentation always refers to the linux-next version of the script. > I'll apply this - a working URL is better than a broken one. But is > there really nothing better to link to than a page that warns "OBSOLETE > CONTENT" at the top? Dear Jon, Unfortunately, I do not find any other documents about this script, so I have to use it even though it's obsolete. Sincerely, Haoyang > > Thanks, > > jon