Re: [cocci] [PATCH] docs/dev-tools: fix a broken URL in dev-tools/coccinelle.rst

Haoyang Liu <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:28:23 +0800
Newsgroups fr.inria.cocci,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.workflows
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 3/10/2026 12:10 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> LIU Haoyang <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> The original supplemental documentation for coccicheck is
>> https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck, which redirects to a not found page,
>> thus change it to https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html,
>> which adds a suffix to original URL to make it direct to the right page.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: LIU Haoyang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst
>> index 2b942e3c8049..f73ccf5397f3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst
>> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Supplemental documentation
>>   
>>   For supplemental documentation refer to the wiki:
>>   
>> -https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck
>> +https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html
>>   
>>   The wiki documentation always refers to the linux-next version of the script.
> I'll apply this - a working URL is better than a broken one.  But is
> there really nothing better to link to than a page that warns "OBSOLETE
> CONTENT" at the top?

Dear Jon,

Unfortunately, I do not find any other documents about this script, so I 
have to use it even though it's obsolete.

Sincerely,
Haoyang

>
> Thanks,
>
> jon