Re: [cocci] Rechecking selected expression list representations
Julia Lawall <[email protected]> Fri, 29 May 2026 08:58:06 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | fr.inria.cocci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-679215323-1780037887=:3655 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 29 May 2026, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Why does the application of such an SmPL disjunction seem to prevent > >> an expected difference display anyhow? > > The disjunction does not mean what you think it means. … > I hope that more clarity can be achieved for another technical detail. > > Markus_Elfring@Sonne:…/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> /usr/bin/spatch --parse-cocci suggestion6_for_Pierrick_Philippe-20260528.cocci > … > @adjusted_display@ > … > ( > *memcmp*(&F.X, E1, E2) > | > *memcmp*(E1, &F.X, E2) > ) > … > > > Such an information representation seems to be usable somehow. > But is the expression list output really correct for the function call specification > in the mentioned test case? I don't know what is the original semantic patch in this case. julia --8323329-679215323-1780037887=:3655--