Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Categorize ARM dts directory
Rob Herring <[email protected]> Wed, 3 May 2023 08:16:46 -0500
| Newsgroups | io.groups.linux-oxnas,dev.linux.lists.chrome-platform,dev.linux.lists.linux-sunxi,org.infradead.lists.linux-amlogic,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-mediatek,org.infradead.lists.linux-rockchip,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-omap,org.kernel.vger.linux-renesas-soc,org.kernel.vger.linux-samsung-soc,org.kernel.vger.linux-tegra,org.ozlabs.lists.linux-aspeed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL_JsqJEdZBS231TvkmmipaXEqzvDjz+A32V6uJ4zfSMAJHn2w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 7:19=E2=80=AFAM Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, May 3, 2023, at 14:13, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 13:39, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> So with pxa93x out of the picture, we can simplify it as using > >> 'pxa' as the name for all the above chips with an Intel XScale > >> core, and 'marvell' for all the other ones that have a Marvell > >> core and exist in mach-mmp. > > > > Should it be 'intel' for pxa[23]xx then? > > Probably yes, that would put it next to ixp4xx, which makes > a lot of sense (same vintage, same cpu core), though it is > a bit funny to have these together with lsi axxia and > altera socfpga, both of which are also in the intel > directory. socfpga is of course the only one that anybody > at Intel cares about these days. We could do a second level of directories here: intel/pxa/ intel/ixp/ intel/socfpga/ arm64 broadcom dts files are structured that way. Rob