Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Categorize ARM dts directory
"Russell King (Oracle)" <[email protected]> Thu, 4 May 2023 11:11:47 +0100
| Newsgroups | io.groups.linux-oxnas,dev.linux.lists.chrome-platform,dev.linux.lists.linux-sunxi,org.infradead.lists.linux-amlogic,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-mediatek,org.infradead.lists.linux-rockchip,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-omap,org.kernel.vger.linux-renesas-soc,org.kernel.vger.linux-samsung-soc,org.kernel.vger.linux-tegra,org.ozlabs.lists.linux-aspeed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 02:40:19PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > I think the only issue remaining is finalizing the mapping of > platforms to subdirs. What I have currently is a mixture of SoC > families and vendors. The most notable are all the Freescale/NXP > platforms, pxa, socfpga, and stm32. It's not consistent with arm64 > either. Once that's finalized, I still need to go update MAINTAINERS. I haven't followed this discussion at all, so here's a question. What does this mean for the _installed_ dtb files? Do they move location? If they do, lots is going to break, because there will be u-boot configurations and other scripts that assume the flat directory structure for the installed dtb files. I don't think changing the installed dtb structure is acceptable at this point in time. It's something that _should_ have been thought about when ARM was converted to dtb, it's too late to be changing that now. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!