Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v7 01/11] fstests: add _loop_image_create_clone() helper

"Darrick J. Wong via Linux-f2fs-devel" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel,org.kernel.vger.fstests,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs
Message-ID <20260701170713.GE6517@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 07:20:28PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Introduce _loop_image_create_clone() and _loop_image_destroy() to mkfs an
> image file and clone it to another image file, and attach a loop device to
> them. And its destroy part.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
> ---
>  common/rc | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index 79189e7e6e94..d7e3e0bdfb1e 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -1520,6 +1520,69 @@ _scratch_resvblks()
>  	esac
>  }
>  
> +# Create a small loop image, run an optional tuning function ($2) on it,
> +# clone it, and attach both to loop devices, returned in ($1).
> +# Args:
> +#   $1: Nameref to return the array of allocated loop devices [base, clone].
> +#   $2: Optional callback function to tune the base filesystem before cloning.
> +_loop_image_create_clone()
> +{
> +	local -n _ret=$1
> +	local pre_clone_tune_func="$2"
> +	local img_file=$TEST_DIR/${seq}.img
> +	local img_file_clone=$TEST_DIR/${seq}_clone.img
> +	local size=$(_small_fs_size_mb 128) # Smallest possible
> +	local loop_devs
> +
> +	# Since we copy the block device image, we keep its size small.
> +	_require_fs_space $TEST_DIR $((size * 1024))
> +
> +	_create_file_sized $((size * 1024 * 1024)) $img_file ||
> +				_fail "Failed: Create $img_file $size"
> +
> +	loop_devs=$(_create_loop_device $img_file)
> +	_ret=($loop_devs)
> +
> +	case $FSTYP in
> +	xfs)
> +		_mkfs_dev "-s size=4096" ${loop_devs[0]}

Not sure why you pass two separate cli arguments as a quoted string, but
my guess is it "doesn't matter" because _try_mkfs_dev uses $* unquoted,
which separates them again.

I HATE BASH.

> +		;;
> +	btrfs)
> +		_mkfs_dev ${loop_devs[0]}

And while I'm whining:    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ actually should be quoted.
Not that fstests is at all good at getting this right.

> +		;;
> +	*)
> +		_mkfs_dev ${loop_devs[0]}
> +		;;
> +	esac
> +
> +	# Only execute if the function argument is not empty
> +	if [ -n "$pre_clone_tune_func" ]; then
> +		$pre_clone_tune_func ${loop_devs[0]}
> +	fi
> +
> +	sync ${loop_devs[0]}
> +	cp $img_file $img_file_clone

What if cp doesn't create a reflink copy?  Can we fill up the $TEST_DIR
despite having checked it for sufficient free space?  Especially on
filesystems that don't support sparse holes?

> +
> +	loop_devs="$loop_devs $(_create_loop_device $img_file_clone)"
> +
> +	_ret=($loop_devs)

Hmm.  Should this function return nonzero if any part of the clone
creation fails?  Or are callers expected to notice that _ret only has
one element?

--D

> +}
> +
> +# Teardown loop devices and delete their underlying backing image files.
> +# Accepts a list of loop device paths (e.g., /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1).
> +_loop_image_destroy()
> +{
> +	for d in "$@"; do
> +		# Retrieve the path of the backing file
> +		local f=$(losetup --noheadings --output BACK-FILE $d)
> +
> +		# Detach the loop device from the backing file
> +		_destroy_loop_device "$d"
> +
> +		# Clean up the backing disk image file
> +		[ -n "$f" ] && rm -f "$f"
> +	done
> +}
>  
>  # Repair scratch filesystem.  Returns 0 if the FS is good to go (either no
>  # errors found or errors were fixed) and nonzero otherwise; also spits out
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.