[f2fs-dev] [PATCH v11 10/20] xfs: don't report dio_mem_align and dio_offset_align for fsverity files

Andrey Albershteyn via Linux-f2fs-devel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel,dev.linux.lists.fsverity,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Sashiko.dev reported that while fsverity files falls back to the
buffered IO for Direct I/O, they should not report non-zero values in
dio_mem_align and dio_offset_align, meaning it's not supported.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Albershteyn <[email protected]>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
index 55667cc762f8..70637cdcc299 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 #include <linux/security.h>
 #include <linux/iversion.h>
 #include <linux/fiemap.h>
+#include <linux/fsverity.h>
 
 /*
  * Directories have different lock order w.r.t. mmap_lock compared to regular
@@ -580,6 +581,10 @@ xfs_report_dioalign(
 	struct block_device	*bdev = target->bt_bdev;
 
 	stat->result_mask |= STATX_DIOALIGN | STATX_DIO_READ_ALIGN;
+
+	if (fsverity_active(VFS_I(ip)))
+		return;
+
 	stat->dio_mem_align = bdev_dma_alignment(bdev) + 1;
 
 	/*
-- 
2.54.0



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.