Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v14 05/21] fsverity: improve flushing performance of fsverity_fill_zerohash

Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 18:37:52 +0000
Newsgroups net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel,dev.linux.lists.fsverity,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 07:42:23PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 10:07:55PM +0200, Andrey Albershteyn wrote:
> > The current version calls flush_dcache_folio(), in memcpy_to_folio(), to
> > flush whole folio on every digest (which is 128 for 4k) on the HIGHMEM
> > systems. Open code folio mapping and flushing to copy all digests at
> > once.
> 
> This looks correct, although to me optimizing for this feels like
> premature optimizations not worth the ugly code unless we have numbers
> to justify it.
> 
> If Eric wants it:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> 
> > +		if (folio_test_partial_kmap(folio) &&
> > +		    off > PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(offset))
> > +			off = PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(offset);
> > +		for (; to < (vaddr + off); to += vi->tree_params.digest_size)
> 
> Style nitpick: no need for braces when comparing with simple
> integer arithmetics like this.
> 
> > +	for (off = offset; off < (offset + len);
> 
> Same here.

Well I didn't ask for it per se, but I pointed it out and asked whether
anyone will care about the combination of XFS && FS_VERITY && HIGHMEM.
Based on Darrick's email it seems the answer may be no?

If it's kept as-is, adding a comment mentioning that it doesn't need to
be optimized for HIGHMEM would help preempt any questions about it.

- Eric


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel