Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: accurately adjust free_sections during free_segment_range
Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/19/26 01:14, Daeho Jeong wrote: > From: Daeho Jeong <[email protected]> > > In free_segment_range(), MAIN_SECS(sbi) is temporarily reduced by `secs` > while valid blocks in the truncated range are evacuated by GC. > > However, if any sections within the truncated range were already free, > failing to deduct them from FREE_I(sbi)->free_sections leads to an > over-estimation of available space in the reduced main area, causing > inconsistent free section accounting. Can you please show me an example for above case? I didn't get it. BTW, it needs to rebase this patch on dev-test branch. Thanks, > > Fix this by calculating the number of already-free sections in the > truncated range under segmap_lock, deducting them from free_sections upon > entering free_segment_range(), and restoring them under segmap_lock on exit. > > Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Sunmin Jeong <[email protected]> > --- > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > index 787133ee2eb2..f3a6fc6d08ae 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > @@ -2200,8 +2200,9 @@ int f2fs_gc_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > static int free_segment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > unsigned int secs, bool dry_run) > { > - unsigned int next_inuse, start, end; > + unsigned int secno, next_inuse, start, end, end_secno; > struct cp_control cpc = { CP_RESIZE, 0, 0, 0 }; > + unsigned int freed_secs = 0; > int gc_mode, gc_type; > int err = 0; > int type; > @@ -2210,6 +2211,7 @@ static int free_segment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > MAIN_SECS(sbi) -= secs; > start = MAIN_SECS(sbi) * SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi); > end = MAIN_SEGS(sbi) - 1; > + end_secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, end); > > mutex_lock(&DIRTY_I(sbi)->seglist_lock); > for (gc_mode = 0; gc_mode < MAX_GC_POLICY; gc_mode++) > @@ -2221,6 +2223,14 @@ static int free_segment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > sbi->next_victim_seg[gc_type] = NULL_SEGNO; > mutex_unlock(&DIRTY_I(sbi)->seglist_lock); > > + spin_lock(&FREE_I(sbi)->segmap_lock); > + for (secno = MAIN_SECS(sbi); secno <= end_secno; secno++) { > + if (!test_bit(secno, FREE_I(sbi)->free_secmap)) > + freed_secs++; > + } > + FREE_I(sbi)->free_sections -= freed_secs; > + spin_unlock(&FREE_I(sbi)->segmap_lock); > + > /* Move out cursegs from the target range */ > for (type = CURSEG_HOT_DATA; type < NR_CURSEG_TYPE; type++) { > err = f2fs_allocate_segment_for_resize(sbi, type, start, end); > @@ -2245,6 +2255,9 @@ static int free_segment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1); > } > out: > + spin_lock(&FREE_I(sbi)->segmap_lock); > + FREE_I(sbi)->free_sections += freed_secs; > + spin_unlock(&FREE_I(sbi)->segmap_lock); > MAIN_SECS(sbi) += secs; > return err; > } _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel