Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: accurately adjust free_sections during free_segment_range
Daeho Jeong <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACOAw_zQNVUtoPat0v1KFD5hkqBF1d=+3FwiGAf0bLma=xdq8g@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 8:57 PM Chao Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 8/19/26 01:14, Daeho Jeong wrote: > > From: Daeho Jeong <[email protected]> > > > > In free_segment_range(), MAIN_SECS(sbi) is temporarily reduced by `secs` > > while valid blocks in the truncated range are evacuated by GC. > > > > However, if any sections within the truncated range were already free, > > failing to deduct them from FREE_I(sbi)->free_sections leads to an > > over-estimation of available space in the reduced main area, causing > > inconsistent free section accounting. > > Can you please show me an example for above case? I didn't get it. Here is a concrete example explaining why this adjustment is needed: Suppose: - Total main sections: MAIN_SECS = 100 (sections 0 .. 99) - Total free sections: free_sections = 30 - We want to shrink the filesystem by 10 sections (secs = 10, range 90 .. 99). - Within the truncated range (sections 90 .. 99): * 6 sections are already free (free_secmap bit is 0) * 4 sections are in-use with valid blocks that need to be migrated by GC. When free_segment_range() enters: 1. MAIN_SECS is temporarily reduced from 100 to 90 so that new block allocations are constrained to sections 0 .. 89. 2. The actual number of free sections available in the reduced range (0 .. 89) is only 24 (30 - 6 = 24). 3. Without this patch: - free_sections remains 30 while MAIN_SECS is 90. - During the subsequent GC migrations, free section checks (such as has_not_enough_free_secs()) will over-estimate available space by 6 sections in the active 0 .. 89 range. - If free_segment_range() fails midway (e.g. -EAGAIN), free_sections accounting becomes inconsistent. With this patch: - We count the 6 already-free sections in the truncated range (90 .. 99) and deduct them from free_sections upon entering (30 - 6 = 24), perfectly matching the actual free sections in the active range 0 .. 89. - On exit, the deducted amount is restored, keeping free_sections consistent throughout the entire resize lifecycle. Hope this clarifies the scenario! Thanks, > > BTW, it needs to rebase this patch on dev-test branch. > > Thanks, > > > > > Fix this by calculating the number of already-free sections in the > > truncated range under segmap_lock, deducting them from free_sections upon > > entering free_segment_range(), and restoring them under segmap_lock on exit. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Sunmin Jeong <[email protected]> > > --- > > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > > index 787133ee2eb2..f3a6fc6d08ae 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > > @@ -2200,8 +2200,9 @@ int f2fs_gc_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > static int free_segment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > unsigned int secs, bool dry_run) > > { > > - unsigned int next_inuse, start, end; > > + unsigned int secno, next_inuse, start, end, end_secno; > > struct cp_control cpc = { CP_RESIZE, 0, 0, 0 }; > > + unsigned int freed_secs = 0; > > int gc_mode, gc_type; > > int err = 0; > > int type; > > @@ -2210,6 +2211,7 @@ static int free_segment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > MAIN_SECS(sbi) -= secs; > > start = MAIN_SECS(sbi) * SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi); > > end = MAIN_SEGS(sbi) - 1; > > + end_secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, end); > > > > mutex_lock(&DIRTY_I(sbi)->seglist_lock); > > for (gc_mode = 0; gc_mode < MAX_GC_POLICY; gc_mode++) > > @@ -2221,6 +2223,14 @@ static int free_segment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > sbi->next_victim_seg[gc_type] = NULL_SEGNO; > > mutex_unlock(&DIRTY_I(sbi)->seglist_lock); > > > > + spin_lock(&FREE_I(sbi)->segmap_lock); > > + for (secno = MAIN_SECS(sbi); secno <= end_secno; secno++) { > > + if (!test_bit(secno, FREE_I(sbi)->free_secmap)) > > + freed_secs++; > > + } > > + FREE_I(sbi)->free_sections -= freed_secs; > > + spin_unlock(&FREE_I(sbi)->segmap_lock); > > + > > /* Move out cursegs from the target range */ > > for (type = CURSEG_HOT_DATA; type < NR_CURSEG_TYPE; type++) { > > err = f2fs_allocate_segment_for_resize(sbi, type, start, end); > > @@ -2245,6 +2255,9 @@ static int free_segment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1); > > } > > out: > > + spin_lock(&FREE_I(sbi)->segmap_lock); > > + FREE_I(sbi)->free_sections += freed_secs; > > + spin_unlock(&FREE_I(sbi)->segmap_lock); > > MAIN_SECS(sbi) += secs; > > return err; > > } > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel