Re: tpm: read burstcount from TPM_STS in one 32-bit transaction

George Wilson <ltcgcw-r/[email protected]>
Newsgroups net.sourceforge.lists.tpmdd-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:36:11AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 15:04 +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > in commit 9754d45e9970 ("tpm: read burstcount from TPM_STS in one
> > 32-bit transaction") you change reading of two 8-bit values to one
> > 32bit read. This is obviously wrong wrt endianess unless the
> > underlying tpm_tis_read32 does endian conversion. 
> 
> Some of the bus read primitives do do endianness conversions.  The
> problem is with the SPI attachment, which has unclear endianness.  A
> standard PCI bus attachment uses ioread32() which automatically
> transforms from a little endian bus to the cpu endianness, however SPI
> is forced to transfer the bytes one at a time over the serial bus and
> then transform.  The assumption seems to be that the TIS TPM is
> replying in little endian format when SPI connected.
> 
> We can probably get the PPC people to confirm this, I believe they have
> a SPI attached TPM.

All the current OpenPOWER hardware designs I'm aware of have the TPM on
I2C.  Trusted Computing support in OpenPOWER firmware depends on it
being on I2C.

> 
> James
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> tpmdd-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.