Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] tpm: parse TPM event logs based on EFI table

Thiebaud Weksteen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups net.sourceforge.lists.tpmdd-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-efi,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <CA+zpnLe8hgSgBbjw8zF=pvykNo9mkVcyR65KY=vFckKf+XMb=Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Thiebaud Weksteen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:47:50AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:00:22PM +0200, Thiebaud Weksteen wrote:
>>
>> >     chip->bin_log_seqops.chip = chip;
>> > -   if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
>> > +
>> > +   if (log_version == EFI_TCG2_EVENT_LOG_FORMAT_TCG_2 ||
>> > +       (!log_version && (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)))
>> >             chip->bin_log_seqops.seqops =
>> >                     &tpm2_binary_b_measurements_seqops;
>>
>> Lets have all the read_log_* versions return the postitive log_version
>> and get rid of the chip->flags check here.
>>
>> ie Doesn't ACPI always return the TPM 1 version?
>
> That is my understanding. Ashley, Nayna, could you confirm the format
> version expected by tpm_of? Could it be both?
>

I've changed the returned code for ACPI but not for DeviceTree.
Without confirmation for tpm_of, I am reluctant to modify the current
behaviour.

>>
>> Jason
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.