[linux-nfc] Re: [PATCH] NFC: cooperation with runtime PM

Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.01.lists.linux-nfc,dev.linux.lists.oe-linux-nfc,org.kernel.vger.netdev
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

Thanks for the patch. Few notes:

On 12/05/2021 09:44, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> We cannot rely on the underlying hardware to do correct
> runtime PM. NFC core needs to get PM reference while
> a device is operational, lest it be suspended when
> it is supposed to be waiting for a target to come
> into range.


Your word wrapping is unusually early - please wrap the commit msg as in
coding style (so around 75-character).
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L578

> 
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
> ---
>  net/nfc/core.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/nfc/core.c b/net/nfc/core.c
> index 573c80c6ff7a..5ca4597c39c7 100644
> --- a/net/nfc/core.c
> +++ b/net/nfc/core.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/rfkill.h>
>  #include <linux/nfc.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  
>  #include <net/genetlink.h>
>  
> @@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ int nfc_fw_download(struct nfc_dev *dev, const char *firmware_name)
>  	pr_debug("%s do firmware %s\n", dev_name(&dev->dev), firmware_name);
>  
>  	device_lock(&dev->dev);
> +	pm_runtime_get_sync(&dev->dev);

This can fail. Probably you wanted pm_runtime_resume_and_get() here.

>  
>  	if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) {
>  		rc = -ENODEV;
> @@ -58,7 +60,10 @@ int nfc_fw_download(struct nfc_dev *dev, const char *firmware_name)
>  	if (rc)
>  		dev->fw_download_in_progress = false;

goto error

>  
> +	device_unlock(&dev->dev);
> +	return rc;

Since last rc cannot be != 0, return 0

Blank line

>  error:
> +	pm_runtime_put(&dev->dev);
>  	device_unlock(&dev->dev);
>  	return rc;
>  }
> @@ -73,9 +78,13 @@ int nfc_fw_download(struct nfc_dev *dev, const char *firmware_name)
>  int nfc_fw_download_done(struct nfc_dev *dev, const char *firmware_name,
>  			 u32 result)
>  {
> +	int rv;

"int rc"

> +
>  	dev->fw_download_in_progress = false;
>  
> -	return nfc_genl_fw_download_done(dev, firmware_name, result);
> +	rv = nfc_genl_fw_download_done(dev, firmware_name, result);
> +	pm_runtime_put(&dev->dev);
> +	return rv;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(nfc_fw_download_done);
>  
> @@ -93,6 +102,7 @@ int nfc_dev_up(struct nfc_dev *dev)
>  	pr_debug("dev_name=%s\n", dev_name(&dev->dev));
>  
>  	device_lock(&dev->dev);
> +	pm_runtime_get_sync(&dev->dev);

Same comments as before.

>  
>  	if (dev->rfkill && rfkill_blocked(dev->rfkill)) {
>  		rc = -ERFKILL;
> @@ -124,7 +134,11 @@ int nfc_dev_up(struct nfc_dev *dev)
>  	if (dev->ops->discover_se && dev->ops->discover_se(dev))
>  		pr_err("SE discovery failed\n");
>  
> +	device_unlock(&dev->dev);
> +	return rc;

Probably same comments as before apply.

> +
>  error:
> +	pm_runtime_put(&dev->dev);
>  	device_unlock(&dev->dev);
>  	return rc;
>  }
> @@ -161,6 +175,9 @@ int nfc_dev_down(struct nfc_dev *dev)
>  		dev->ops->dev_down(dev);
>  
>  	dev->dev_up = false;
> +	pm_runtime_put(&dev->dev);
> +	device_unlock(&dev->dev);
> +	return rc;

return 0

>  
>  error:
>  	device_unlock(&dev->dev);
> 


Best regards,
Krzysztof
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.