Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] spapr: nvdimm: Implement H_SCM_FLUSH hcall

"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.01.lists.linux-nvdimm,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,org.kernel.vger.kvm-ppc,org.nongnu.qemu-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 3/24/21 8:37 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 09:47:38AM -0400, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
>> The patch adds support for the SCM flush hcall for the nvdimm devices.
>> To be available for exploitation by guest through the next patch.
>>
>> The hcall expects the semantics such that the flush to return
>> with H_BUSY when the operation is expected to take longer time along
>> with a continue_token. The hcall to be called again providing the
>> continue_token to get the status. So, all fresh requsts are put into
>> a 'pending' list and flush worker is submitted to the thread pool.
>> The thread pool completion callbacks move the requests to 'completed'
>> list, which are cleaned up after reporting to guest in subsequent
>> hcalls to get the status.
>>
>> The semantics makes it necessary to preserve the continue_tokens
>> and their return status even across migrations. So, the pre_save
>> handler for the device waits for the flush worker to complete and
>> collects all the hcall states from 'completed' list. The necessary
>> nvdimm flush specific vmstate structures are added to the spapr
>> machine vmstate.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <[email protected]>
> 
> An overal question: surely the same issue must arise on x86 with
> file-backed NVDIMMs.  How do they handle this case?

On x86 we have different ways nvdimm can be discovered. ACPI NFIT, e820 
map and virtio_pmem. Among these virio_pmem always operated with 
synchronous dax disabled and both ACPI and e820 doesn't have the ability 
to differentiate support for synchronous dax.

With that I would expect users to use virtio_pmem when using using file 
backed NVDIMMS

-aneesh
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.