Re: [PATCH v2] libnvdimm/region: Update nvdimm_has_flush() to handle ND_REGION_ASYNC

Vaibhav Jain <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.01.lists.linux-nvdimm,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,org.kernel.vger.stable
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> writes:

> On 4/6/21 5:07 PM, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
>> Hi Aneesh,
>> Thanks for looking into this patch.
>> 
>> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> writes:
>> 
>>> Vaibhav Jain <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>>> In case a platform doesn't provide explicit flush-hints but provides an
>>>> explicit flush callback via ND_REGION_ASYNC region flag, then
>>>> nvdimm_has_flush() still returns '0' indicating that writes do not
>>>> require flushing. This happens on PPC64 with patch at [1] applied,
>>>> where 'deep_flush' of a region was denied even though an explicit
>>>> flush function was provided.
>>>>
>>>> Similar problem is also seen with virtio-pmem where the 'deep_flush'
>>>> sysfs attribute is not visible as in absence of any registered nvdimm,
>>>> 'nd_region->ndr_mappings == 0'.
>>>>
>>>> Fix this by updating nvdimm_has_flush() adding a condition to
>>>> nvdimm_has_flush() testing for ND_REGION_ASYNC flag on the region
>>>> and see if a 'region->flush' callback is assigned. Also remove
>>>> explicit test for 'nd_region->ndr_mapping' since regions can be marked
>>>> 'ND_REGION_SYNC' without any explicit mappings as in case of
>>>> virtio-pmem.
>>>
>>> Do we need to check for ND_REGION_ASYNC? What if the backend wants to
>>> provide a synchronous dax region but with different deep flush semantic
>>> than writing to wpq flush address?
>>> ie,
>> 
>> For a synchronous dax region, writes arent expected to require any
>> flushing (or deep-flush) so this function should ideally return '0' in
>> such a case. Hence I had added the test for ND_REGION_ASYNC region flag.
>> 
>
> that is not correct. For example, we could ideally move the wpq flush as 
> an nd_region->flush callback for acpi or we could implement a deep flush 
> for a synchronous dax region exposed by papr_scm driver that ensures 
> stores indeed reached the media managed by the hypervisor.
Sure, makes sense now. I have sent out a v3 of this patch with this
addressed.

>
> -aneesh

-- 
Cheers
~ Vaibhav
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.